Mote v. Mote
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Mobley, Justice.
An order or judgment that merely declares the rights of the parties, without any express command or prohibition, is not one which may be the basis of contempt proceedings. Brown v. Smith, 150 Ga. 111 (102 S. E. 813); Hammock v. Hammock, 209 Ga. 751 (76 S. E. 2d 15); 12 Am. Jur. 406, § 24. Accordingly, where a petition filed by the defendant in error, seeking an attachment for contempt against the plaintiff in error (the father), alleges: that the parties were divorced in February, 1956; that a decree of custody as to their minor child was entered, which provided in part as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hammock v. HammockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
- Brown v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
- White v. HeldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
- Gormley v. WaltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- Walton v. BentonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
3Cited by15 opinions
- Water Services, Inc. And Farris Chemical Company v. Tesco Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Griggers v. BryantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Ogletree v. WatsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
- Veal v. VealSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
- Palmer v. BunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.