Legal Opinion

Mosher v. Johnson

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 20, 1921No. Civ. No. 3740PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, P. J.

Plaintiff brought this action for damages alleged to have been suffered by reason of the refusal and failure of the defendant to purchase certain personal property, the furniture of an apartment house, according to the terms of a written agreement, which provided that the price therefor should be determined by arbitration. Judgment was accorded to plaintiff and the defendant has appealed.

[1] It was alleged in the complaint, and the court found, that it was the agreement of the parties relating to the purchase and sale of the furniture that, if the parties could not agree upon the price, that…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Zeigler v. BonnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Brunt v. Occidental Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Tarvin v. DaveyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Duisenberg-Wichman & Co. v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Greer v. FreitasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API