Legal Opinion

St. Louis Cotton Compress Co. v. Arkansas

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 4, 1922No. 120PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

This is a suit by the State of Arkansas against a corporation of Missouri authorized to do business in Arkansas. It is brought to recover five per cent, on the gross premiums paid by the defendant, the plaintiff in error, for insurance upon its property in Arkansas, to companies not authorized to do business in the State. A statute of the State purports to.impose a liability for this amount as a tax. Crawford & Moses, Digest, (1921) § 9967. The answer alleged that the policies were contracted for, delivered and paid for in St. Louis, Missouri, the domicil of the corporation, because the rates…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Allgeyer v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Child Labor Tax CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Lipke v. LedererSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Cheney Bros. Co. v. Commonwealth of MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. Prudential Insurance v. BenjaminSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Louisville Gas & Electric Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Quaker City Cab Co. v. Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Hanover Fire Insurance v. HardingSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API