Legal Opinion

American Future Systems, Inc. v. Pennsylvania State University

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 9, 1982No. 81-2674Published

1Opinion

OPINION SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING

SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.

Under ordinary circumstances, the . petition for rehearing and for rehearing in banc filed by appellees (“Penn State”) which raises issues previously raised and rejected by an undivided panel of this court in its decision would not warrant any comment in conjunction with the order denying said petition. However, because five members of this court have joined in a statement which does not suggest that the panel’s statement of the applicable law is incorrect, and have nonetheless voted for rehearing in banc notwithstanding our general…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re R. M. J.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. In Re RMJSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Ad World, Inc. v. Township of DoylestownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  4. American Future Systems, Inc. v. The Pennsylvania State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API