Legal Opinion

Kimball v. Brawner

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1871PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Jlppeal from St. Louis Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCurries, Judge

The defendant contracted in writing to pay the plaintiff 44 twenty per cent, upon all original or first years’ premiums *-* collected and paid in by him (the plaintiff) upon policies issued upon applications taken ” by the plaintiff. This suit is brought upon the contract to recover a balance claimed to be due under the above-recited stipulation.

According to the obvious reading of this stipulation it is clear that it secured commissions to the plaintiff alone upon moneys actually collected and paid in by him. His right to the commission is made dependent upon an actual collection and payment.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Southwestern Freight & Cotton Press Co. v. StanardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  2. Soutier v. KellermanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Cole v. SkrainkaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  2. Elliott v. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
  3. Long Bros. v. J. K. Armsby Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Evans v. Western Brass Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  5. Snoqualmi Realty Co. v. MoynihanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API