Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fonken v. Community Church of Kamrar

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 19, 1983No. 68478Published

1DissentSchultz, Justice

Because I cannot agree with the use of the compulsory deference approach to resolve church property disputes or the manner in which the neutral principles approach is applied, I respectfully dissent. The majority indicates that they use both the compulsory deference and the neutral principle approaches in resolving this property dispute. They decide that the trial court correctly applied both principles. Although the deference principle was correctly applied, I would reject this approach. Instead, I would resolve church property disputes under neutral principles of law since it does not…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Presbyterian Church in US v. Mary Elizabeth Blue Hull Memorial Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Jones v. WolfSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Carnes v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  4. Presbyterian Church in United States v. Eastern Heights Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  5. Crumbley v. SolomonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API