Legal Opinion

Johnnie Lucas and Chester Sturgis v. People of the State of Michigan

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 5, 1970No. 19198_1PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.

This is a habeas corpus case presenting the primary issue of whether there is a conflict between the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, as construed in Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 81 S.Ct. 1684, 6 L.Ed.2d 1081, and the last sentence of Article 1, § 11 of the Michigan Constitution of 1963, which is as follows:

“Searches and seizures. Sec. 11. The person, houses, papers and possessions of every person shall be secure from unreasonable searches and seizures. No warrant to search any place or to seize any person or things shall issue without describing…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Peyton v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. People v. HarperMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Rowe v. PeytonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Theodore R. Allen v. E. P. Perini, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
  2. Danny G. Rachel v. Donald E. BordenkircherCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  3. Cornelius E. Sarzen v. Charles W. GaughanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
  4. Sweet v. CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. Victor Turner v. Margaret BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API