Legal Opinion

Stappenbeck v. Mather

Oneida County Court

Decided September 15, 1911PublishedCited by 2 opinions

•Action for partition.

1Opinion of the CourtHazard, J.

This action is for partition, with a prayer for certain equitable relief in the contingency that certain *436decisions are arrived at by the court. The facts with reference to the matter, I think, are established as follows:— By a warranty deed dated July 1, 1870, one Alexander Burridge, a naturalized citizen of the United States and a' resident of Utica, purchased a certain parcel of real estate in the city of Utica, which is the real property involved in this action. Said Burridge died in November, 1874, intestate; leaving a widow, Caroline Burridge, and seven brothers, viz.: Bobert,. William,.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stewart v. . FergusonNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Sweetland v. . BuellNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Weed v. . WeedNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  4. Thomas v. . HarmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Hamershlag v. DuryeaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Majestic Tile Co. v. Nicholls, New York County Courts1936
  2. Tonges v. Vanderveer Canarsie Improvement Syndicate, Inc., New York County Courts1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API