Ruffin v. State

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

MORROW, Presiding Judge. —

A review of the record in the light of the motion for rehearing leads to the conclusion that the denial of a new trial sought upon the ground that there was error in overruling the motion for a continuance, does not present error requiring or warranting a reversal of the judgment. The facts upon which the appellant’s contention is based appear in the original opinion. The evidence was definite and uncontroverted that" while the deceased was at his home, he expressed the intention and desire to kill the appellant but was caused to desist…