Legal Opinion
Live & Let Live, Inc. v. Carlsberg Mobile Home Properties, Ltd.-'73
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided April 5, 1979No. 78-3800PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BY THE COURT:
After a jury trial in this diversity case resulted in a verdict for $834,020.04, the district court, on proper motion, decided that it did not have diversity jurisdiction, vacated the judgment it had entered on the verdict, and remanded the case to the state court from which it had been removed. The plaintiff, seeking to preserve its verdict, filed a notice of appeal to which defendant has responded with a motion to dismiss the appeal on two grounds: first, the order vacating the court’s judgment and remanding the case to the state court is not a “final decision” as required by…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Thermtron Products, Inc. v. HermansdorferSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mas v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Tutun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- B., Inc. v. Miller Brewing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- In Re Ben CarterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Kenneth A. Royal v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- In re WeaverCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Marsh Investment Corp. v. LangfordDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.