Legal Opinion

Bricker v. Department of Labor & Industries

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 20, 2011No. 40064-2-IIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn-Brintnall, J.

¶1 After the Department of Labor and Industries (L&I) conceded that it had failed to respond in a timely manner to Ken Bricker’s public records request, the trial court imposed a per diem penalty of $90 for the untimely disclosure of 16 documents and a per diem penalty of $15 for the untimely disclosure of 3 additional documents, for a total penalty of $29,445. Bricker appeals the trial court’s refusal to impose a per document penalty in addition to the per diem penalty, and L&I cross appeals the amount of the per diem penalty. Because the trial court’s award did not constitute an abuse of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Soter v. Cowles Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Soter v. Cowles Pub. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Sanders v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Yousoufian v. Office of Ron SimsWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Sanders v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cedar Grove Composting, Inc. v. City of MarysvilleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  2. Jeff Zink, et ux v. City of MesaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  3. Cedar Grove Composting Incorporated, / X-app. v. City Of Marysville, / X-res.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. Jeff Zink, et ux v. City of MesaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API