Bricker v. Department of Labor & Industries
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn-Brintnall, J.
¶1 After the Department of Labor and Industries (L&I) conceded that it had failed to respond in a timely manner to Ken Bricker’s public records request, the trial court imposed a per diem penalty of $90 for the untimely disclosure of 16 documents and a per diem penalty of $15 for the untimely disclosure of 3 additional documents, for a total penalty of $29,445. Bricker appeals the trial court’s refusal to impose a per document penalty in addition to the per diem penalty, and L&I cross appeals the amount of the per diem penalty. Because the trial court’s award did not constitute an abuse of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Soter v. Cowles Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Soter v. Cowles Pub. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Sanders v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Yousoufian v. Office of Ron SimsWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Sanders v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cedar Grove Composting, Inc. v. City of MarysvilleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Jeff Zink, et ux v. City of MesaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- Cedar Grove Composting Incorporated, / X-app. v. City Of Marysville, / X-res.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Jeff Zink, et ux v. City of MesaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018