Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Thompson v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 15, 2003No. S03G0176Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCarley, Justice

The majority correctly holds that the evidence adduced at trial shows that Thompson committed the offense of child molestation at his residence in Houston County, and I certainly concur in the affirmance of that conviction. I dissent, however, to the reversal of Thompson’s conviction for the sexual battery occurring at his automobile repair shop. With regard to that crime, I believe that the Court of Appeals correctly held that he made a solemn admission in judicio that his place of business was located in Houston County and that such admission suffices to prove venue in that county.

The…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  2. Farmer v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  3. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  4. Rhode v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  5. Dunn v. DunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API