Holmes v. Area Glass, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtWolf, J.
Appellants, the plaintiffs in the trial court, raise several issues on appeal. We find that one has merit and requires reversal and remand for a new trial. It is, therefore, unnecessary to reach the other issues. We determine the trial court erred in denying the request to remove a dismissed party from the caption on the verdict form.
In March 2009, appellants, Jarvis and Marsha Holmes, filed a negligence action against Area Glass, Inc. (Area Glass) and State Farm Mutual Insurance Company (State Farm). They alleged they contacted their insurance company, State Farm, about a damaged windshield,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fabre v. MarinSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Saleeby v. Rocky Elson Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2009
- Muhammad v. Toys" R" US, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Henry v. Beacon Ambulance Serv. Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Altamonte Hitch & Trailer v. U-Haul Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Allen v. State Farm Florida Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Panama City-Bay County Airport & Industrial District v. Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- AMERICAN PRIME TITLE SERVICES, LLC v. ZHI WANGDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021
- CRST Expedited, Inc. v. Alfred F. WallaceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
- WILLIAM HERNANDEZ v. CGI WINDOWS AND DOORS, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.