Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Area Glass, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 26, 2013No. 1D12-2739PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWolf, J.

Appellants, the plaintiffs in the trial court, raise several issues on appeal. We find that one has merit and requires reversal and remand for a new trial. It is, therefore, unnecessary to reach the other issues. We determine the trial court erred in denying the request to remove a dismissed party from the caption on the verdict form.

In March 2009, appellants, Jarvis and Marsha Holmes, filed a negligence action against Area Glass, Inc. (Area Glass) and State Farm Mutual Insurance Company (State Farm). They alleged they contacted their insurance company, State Farm, about a damaged windshield,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fabre v. MarinSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Saleeby v. Rocky Elson Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2009
  3. Muhammad v. Toys" R" US, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  4. Henry v. Beacon Ambulance Serv. Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. Altamonte Hitch & Trailer v. U-Haul Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Allen v. State Farm Florida Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  2. Panama City-Bay County Airport & Industrial District v. Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  3. AMERICAN PRIME TITLE SERVICES, LLC v. ZHI WANGDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021
  4. CRST Expedited, Inc. v. Alfred F. WallaceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
  5. WILLIAM HERNANDEZ v. CGI WINDOWS AND DOORS, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API