Legal Opinion
Phaneuf v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 8, 1990No. 89-66PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRIFFIN, Judge.
This is an appeal from a guideline departure sentence. The reasons given for de*686parture were based on probation violations and are invalid. Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla.1989); Ree v. State, 14 F.L.W. 565, — So.2d - (Fla. Nov. 16, 1989). Accordingly, the defendant’s sentence is vacated and the cause remanded for resentencing within the guidelines.
Sentence VACATED; case REMANDED for resentencing.
COBB and PETERSON, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lambert v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lipscomb v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Ramsey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Roberts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990