Legal Opinion

Phaneuf v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 8, 1990No. 89-66PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIFFIN, Judge.

This is an appeal from a guideline departure sentence. The reasons given for de*686parture were based on probation violations and are invalid. Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla.1989); Ree v. State, 14 F.L.W. 565, — So.2d - (Fla. Nov. 16, 1989). Accordingly, the defendant’s sentence is vacated and the cause remanded for resentencing within the guidelines.

Sentence VACATED; case REMANDED for resentencing.

COBB and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lambert v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lipscomb v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Ramsey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. Roberts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990