Legal Opinion

Craddick v. Emery

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1916No. 13418PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Jurey, J., entered October 2, 1915, upon findings in favor of certain defendants, in an action on a promissory note, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

W. F. Craddick, claiming as indorsee of a promissory note, instituted this action to recover thereon. In his complaint he set forth a note for $1,000, purported to have been executed by H. A. Emery and C. E. Lawson to Adelbert Fournier, and by Fournier indorsed in blank and delivered to him. Judgment was demanded against the indorsee as well as the purported makers. To the complaint, Fournier answered, setting up want of notice of nonpayment at the time of the maturity of the note. Emery filed an answer in which he admitted the execution of the note, and, by way of an affirmative defense, set…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. WeldonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Comings v. LeedySupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  3. Arnold v. WiltIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Smith v. HightowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Grant v. the Aerodraulics Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API