Legal Opinion · Dissent

Herskovitz v. Commonwealth, State Civil Service Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 3, 1987No. Appeal 1655 C.D. 1986Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

President Judge Crumlish, Jr.:

I respectfully dissent.

The issue, as the majority correctly notes, is whether the General Assembly intended those who serve in the Pennsylvania National Guard and Reserves to be soldiers, who by definition must have “served in the armed forces of the United States.”

The majority’s disposition of that issue is, in my judgment, inconsistent with the express language of the Code and contrary to the General Assembly’s intent.

The Military Code defines the term “soldier” as

a person who served in the armed forces of the United States, or in any…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Latella v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Feinerman v. JonesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API