Herskovitz v. Commonwealth, State Civil Service Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
President Judge Crumlish, Jr.:
I respectfully dissent.
The issue, as the majority correctly notes, is whether the General Assembly intended those who serve in the Pennsylvania National Guard and Reserves to be soldiers, who by definition must have “served in the armed forces of the United States.”
The majority’s disposition of that issue is, in my judgment, inconsistent with the express language of the Code and contrary to the General Assembly’s intent.
The Military Code defines the term “soldier” as
a person who served in the armed forces of the United States, or in any…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Latella v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Feinerman v. JonesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986