Legal Opinion

Cessna v. Hulce

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1926No. 17300. Decree affirmedPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dunn

This is a partition suit in which the controversy is about the title to one undivided fourth of the land. The appellee is the undisputed owner of one-half through a deed made by a master in chancery on February 27, 1917, upon the foreclosure of a mortgage on that portion of the land, and the appellant of one-fourth, and each claims title to the other fourth. The appellee’s title to the one-fourth in dispute is derived through a deed of all the land by the former owner, Elizabeth O’Ferrall, to Robert L. O’Ferrall and Nellie O’Ferrall Hulce, dated March 9, 1920, recorded March 10, 1920, and a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. AyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Booker v. BookerIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Blake v. BlakeIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Delano v. BennettIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Webber v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reed v. EastinIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  2. US Bank National Ass'n v. VillasenorAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  3. County of Cook v. SchroederAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  4. Phillips v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
  5. Stump v. Swanson Development Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API