Legal Opinion
Grosjean v. American Paint Works
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided April 15, 1935No. 16041PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LECHE, Judge.
On October 30, 1934-, the supervisor of public accounts of the state of Louisiana filed in the civil district court for the parish of Orleans a rule against the American ■ Paint Works. It was alleged that the defendant in rule was a dealer in kerosene within the meaning and intent of Act No. 15 of the First Extraordinary Session of the Legislature for the year 1934; that on October 15, 1934, it had in its possession, at its place of business in the city of New Orleans, S,00G gallons of a refined petroleum product having the chemical or scientific properties specified in said act…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Downs v. DunnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- State v. Cedar Grove Refining Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
- City of New Orleans v. VinciSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Town of St. Martinville v. DugasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Butchers' Co-op. Abattoir, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Puerto Rico Ilustrado, Inc. v. BuscagliaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1945
- In Re Winton Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1936
- Houck v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Gulf South Enterprises, Inc. v. Delta Materials Operating Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Williams v. United Most Worshipful St. John's Grand LodgeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.