Legal Opinion

Dodson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 10, 1904No. 2831PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Ellis. Tried before Hon. J. E. Dillard. Appeal from a conviction of manslaughter; penalty, five years imprisonment in the penitentiary. The following statement taken from appellant’s brief is substantially correct: Appellant was foreman of a county convict gang working on the public roads twenty miles south of Waxahachie; the gang consisted of several negroes and two or three white men.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the District Court of Ellis. Tried before Hon. J. E. Dillard. Appeal from a conviction of manslaughter; penalty, five years imprisonment in the penitentiary. The following statement taken from appellant’s brief is substantially correct: Appellant was foreman of a county convict gang working on the public roads twenty miles south of Waxahachie; the gang consisted of several negroes and two or three white men. On September 6, 1901, at the camp during supper two of the negro convicts began to abuse each other, using very obscene language. Appellant reprimanded them and threatened…

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.—Appellant

Appellant was convicted of manslaughter, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of five years. This case was before us at the Tyler term, 1902, and was reversed for reasons set out in the opinion as found in 6 Texas Ct. Rep., 311. The facts are not materially different as reported in that case than those found in the record now before us. Error is assigned upon the charge of .the court on the issue of self-defense: “The jury are further instructed * * * if they believe from the evidence that de fendant Sam Dodson shot…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Holland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
  2. McMillan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API