Legal Opinion

Spaulding v. Cahill

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 18, 1986No. 84-046PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants, John and Janet Cahill, appeal from an order of the superior court denying their motion for dissolution of plaintiffs writ of attachment. We reverse.

On January 11, 1983, the superior court entered an order providing that plaintiff shall recover from defendants the principal sum of $5,000 together with interests and costs. On March 11, 1983, plaintiff filed for a writ of attachment to secure property that could satisfy her judgment. The court held a hearing on the matter, and on March 29, 1983, denied plaintiffs motion. One month later, plaintiff moved for reconsideration, alleging…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pond v. BakerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1883
  2. Cox v. JohnsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1840
  3. Rodrigue v. BironSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Canney v. Capoccia (In re Daly & Sinnott Law Centers PLLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 2003
  2. J & B International Trucks, Inc. v. BessetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API