Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Evans

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 6, 1967No. 42540PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Judge.

1. There is no requirement that before bringing this kind of action the insured must have paid off the judgment. Smoot v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 299 F2d 525. The allegations were sufficient to withstand the general demurrers. See Cotton States Mut. Ins. Co. v. Phillips, 112 Ga. App. 600 (145 SE2d 643); Cotton States Mut. Ins. Co. v. Phillips, 110 Ga. App. 581, 583 (2) (139 SE2d 412); Cotton States Mut. Ins. Co. v. Fields, 106 Ga. App. 740 (128 SE2d 358).

2. The only question remaining is whether the jury was authorized by the evidence to find that the insurer violated any…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Cowden v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Critz v. Farmers Insurance GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Waters v. American Cas. Co. of Reading, PaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  5. Hart v. Republic Mutual Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Southern General Insurance v. HoltSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
  2. Tyler v. Grange Ins. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  3. McCall v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  4. Crabb v. National Indemnity CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. BrightmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API