Legal Opinion

Matter of Bauer

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 14, 2004PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Petitioner, a Judge of the Troy City Court, seeks review of a determination of the State Commission on Judicial Conduct. With various members dissenting as to particular specifications, the Commission sustained 39 charges (containing 62 specifications) of misconduct and determined that petitioner should be removed from office (see NY Const, art VI, § 22; Judiciary Law § 44). Upon our plenary review of the record and after considering the evidence and legal arguments raised, we conclude that petitioner’s conduct warrants removal.

By formal disciplinary complaint dated…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. FelderNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. People v. WitenskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1965

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. Indiana Insurance Co. v. DreimanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Matter of FeinbergNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Matter of RestainoNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. In re HartNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. In re Daniel C.New York City Family Court · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API