Legal Opinion

Cotton-Macauley Co. v. Deshields

California Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1922No. Sac. No. 3205PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShurtleff, J.

Intervener appeals from a judgment ordering the issuance of a peremptory writ of mandate directed to George M. DeShields, auditor of the county of Tehama, this state, commanding him to draw a warrant on the treasurer of said county in favor of plaintiff for a specified amount.

The material facts are as follows:

In April, 1920, the board of supervisors of Tehama County, by proper notice, advertised for bids for the construction of a reinforced concrete bridge over Deer Creek, on the route of the state highway in said county. The notice, among other things, provided for two separate bids, one to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cotton-Macauley Co. v. DeshieldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Santa Cruz Portland Cement Co. v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API