Commonwealth v. Karpowski
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 15, Jan. T., 1895, by defendant, from order of Q. S. Northampton Co., June T., 1894, No. 52, overruling motion in arrest of judgment. Indictment for false pretenses. . The jury returned a verdict of guilty. The defendant moved to arrest the judgment on the ground that the court had no jurisdiction, and also on the ground that there were fatal variances between' the indictment and proofs.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 15, Jan. T., 1895, by defendant, from order of Q. S. Northampton Co., June T., 1894, No. 52, overruling motion in arrest of judgment. Indictment for false pretenses. . The jury returned a verdict of guilty. The defendant moved to arrest the judgment on the ground that the court had no jurisdiction, and also on the ground that there were fatal variances between' the indictment and proofs. The court overruled the motion in arrest of judgment in an opinion by Reeder., J., which was as follows : “ It is claimed that this court has no jurisdiction of this case because the offense was…
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam,
In his opinion disposing of the motion in arrest of judgment, etc., the learned trial judge has satisfactorily shown that the averment of jurisdiction in the indictment was fully sustained by the evidence; and that the conviction of the defendant in manner and form as indicted should be sustained.
We affirm the judgment on his opinion; and it is ordered that the record be remitted to the court below.
2Cited by18 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PrepSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- People v. HoffmannMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Bates v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Davis v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- Commonwealth v. SchmunkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.