Legal Opinion
United States v. Cooper
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 11, 2017No. Criminal No. 2015-0152PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge
In this criminal case, the Government moved in limine, Dkts. 135 and 160, to introduce certain evidence of bad acts of the Defendants either as intrinsic to the crimes charged in the Superseding Indictment or, in the alternative, as extrinsic evidence admissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b). Only Defendant Tony Bryant opposed these motions. Opp’n [Dkt. 143]. The Superseding Indictment charges the Defendants with conspiracy to commit theft of government funds and to defraud the United States, in violation of 18…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Bowie, JuanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Cassell, DwayneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Ronald R. Moore, United States of America v. Perseval BrightCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Edward Adio BadruCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Hasston, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mills v. Merrimack Police Dept.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2004
- Mills v. Merrimack Police Dept.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2004
- United States v. OlaitanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023