Legal Opinion

Matthews v. Morgan

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 19, 1927No. 15192PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¡RILEY, J.

Plaintiff in error was plaintiff below. She was a minor and a member of the Choctaw Tribe of Indians. The land involved was allotted to her by reason of her- enrollment as a member of said tribe. T. A. McManus was regularly appointed her guardian, and as such instituted proceedings in the county court of Atoka county for a sale of the land in controversy. As grounds for the sale of the said land the guardian alleged in his petition in the county court that:

“* * * That the annual income therefrom is approximately $no; that said real estate • is incumbered to the amount of $no, with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Abraham v. HomerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Luker v. MastersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Nolan v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Cook v. SpeakSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matthews v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Excise Board of Le Flore County v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Matthews v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API