Steve H. v. Department of Health
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CARNEY, Justice.
*110I. INTRODUCTION
A father appeals the superior court's decision terminating his parental rights. He argues that the superior court clearly erred in finding that he abandoned his son under the Child in Need of Aid (CINA) statutes. He also argues that there was insufficient evidence to support termination, claiming that the record does not support the superior court's findings that returning his son to his care would risk emotional or physical harm and that termination was in his son's best interests. Because the superior court did not clearly err in making these findings, we…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Barbara P. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Pravat P. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Jon S. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Dale H. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Hannah B. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.