Primm v. City of Carondelet
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from St. Louis Law Commissioner’s Court. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
RylaNd, Judge,
delivered tie opinion of the court.
Primm was appointed city counsellor for the city of Caron-delet, under the provisions of an ordinance approved 14th January, 1853. The counsellor'So appointed was to hold his office for one year or until his successor should be duly appointed. The appointment was to commence on the 1st day of January in each and every year. The compensation of the city coun-sellor was fixed at the sum of two hundred and fifty dollars per annum, payable quarterly, on the 1st days of April, July, October and January in each year. The counsellor was required to…
2Cited by10 opinions
- State ex rel. Wingate v. ValléSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
- State ex rel. Henson v. SheppardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- State ex rel. Attorney-General v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
- State Ex Rel. Hall v. VaughnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- Head v. Curators of the University of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.