Chrisman v. Schmickle

I. The pleadings in the injunction action, in which a temporary writ was issued, were introduced in evidence on the trial of this case. The alleged wrongful act charged by Sehmickle, the plaintiff in that action and the appellant herein, against Frank Chrisman and his son John, defendants therein and appellees in this action, was the refusal by them to permit him to go upon premises owned by them, for the purpose of opening and repairing a tile drain situated thereon. The tile drain of the plaintiff intersected with a similar drain on the premises of the defendant, and was designed to carry…