Legal Opinion
Blair v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 4, 1936No. Docket No. 26, Calendar No. 38,643PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.
Plaintiff had judgment in trial before the court without a jury for value of baggage and contents lost to her under the following circumstances stipulated by counsel :
“The plaintiff, Buth Blair, purchased a ticket in Washington, D. C., for a trip to Detroit, Michigan, on a Greyhound bus. She rode on the bus from Washington to Pittsburgh, Pa., at which point there was a change of busses and also a one hour wait-over. When the bus was ready to leave Pittsburgh for Detroit, the porter placed the plaintiff’s baggage on the baggage rack inside of the bus above the seat of the passenger. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Holmes v. North German Lloyd Steamship Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Baehr v. DowneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. BarksdaleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Fraam v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Springer v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Clott v. GREYHOUND LINES, INCORPORATEDSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Greene v. New York Cent. R.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1952