Legal Opinion
Matlack v. Day
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 15, 2005No. 5D04-2978PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
907 So.2d 577 (2005)
Kelly MATLACK, Petitioner,
v.
James DAY, Respondent.
No. 5D04-2978.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
July 15, 2005.
Thomas C. Smith, of Hassell, Moorhead & Carroll, Daytona Beach, for Petitioner.
David J. Volk and Michael E. Dujovne, of Volk Law Offices, P.A., Melbourne, for Respondent.
2Per curiam
Petitioner, Kelly Matlack ["Matlack"], seeks certiorari review of an order denying her motion for protective order. Matlack is a defendant in a civil action filed by the plaintiff-respondent, James A. Day ["Day"]. Day alleges that Matlack negligently operated a motor vehicle…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Haines City Community Dev. v. HeggsSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Martin-Johnson, Inc. v. SavageSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Boston Old Colony Ins. Co. v. GutierrezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
- Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. HessDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Shell Oil Co. v. PAR FOUR PARTNER.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- Nevin v. Palm Beach County School Bd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007