Legal Opinion

Hartzol v. McDonald's Corp.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 5, 2006No. 05 C 2120PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BUCKLO, District Judge.

This action is brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 by Quitmon Hartzol (“Hartzol”) against his former employer, McDonald’s Corporation (“McDonald’s”). Hartzol has brought race discrimination and retaliation claims against McDonald’s, and McDonald’s has moved for summary judgment. ■ I grant McDonald’s motion.

I

Summary judgment is appropriate where the record and affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Barbara Payne v. Michael PauleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. HALO BRANDED SOLUTIONS, INC. v. GoldmanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  2. Harris v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
  3. Robertson v. Chicago Public SchoolsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  4. Wells v. ObaisiDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API