Legal Opinion

Citizens' Bank v. Pearson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 13, 1927No. 8 Div. 869Published

1Opinion

The phase of the case now material and for further consideration is the effect of the statute (section 6890, Code) on the claim for damages for conversion of mortgaged property during the intervening time from the taking over of the execution of the work by the surety company and the record of the bank's demand note and chattel mortgage. The two instruments adverted to are: That to secure the indebtedness of L. C. Pearson and J. B. Whitaker to the bank for $5,750, due "on demand without grace," and dated July 7, 1920, recorded September 24, 1920; and that to provide indemnity to the surety…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Center v. P. & M. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
  2. Ohio Life Insurance & Trust Co. v. LedyardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846
  3. Booker v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  4. Lehman, Durr & Co. v. Van Winkle & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  5. Pinckard v. CasselsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API