Legal Opinion · Dissent

Masuccio v. Standard Fire Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 19, 1989No. 04-88-00258-CVPublished

1DissentPeeples, Justice

This case reduces to one question: whether the summary judgment evidence shows as a matter of law that Laura Ma-succio was not in the course and scope of *858her employment when she died in a one-car automobile accident at 3:00 a.m. I would hold that course of employment was refuted by the undisputed evidence that Laura had left a business meeting 4 hours and 45 minutes before the 3:00 a.m. wreck, and she was on a highway traveling toward San Antonio and not in the direction of her home in New Braunfels.

The course and scope question arises in the following context. The carrier moved for summary…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Zale Corporation v. RosenbaumTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Equitable General Insurance Co. of Texas v. YatesTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Yates v. Equitable Gen. Ins. Co. of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
  5. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API