Legal Opinion

Shanko v. ICE

District Court, S.D. California

Decided April 3, 2020No. 3:19-cv-01726Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SATTAR SHANKO, Case No.: 19cv1726 LAB (JLB) 12 Petitioner, ORDER OF DISMISSAL 13 v. 14 I.C.E., 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner Sattar Shanko, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for Writ 18 of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, and has been granted leave to proceed in 19 forma pauperis. The Court is required to screen his petition under 28 U.S.C. 20 §§ 1915(e)(2)(b) and 1915A(b), and to dismiss it to the extent it fails to state a claim. The 21 Court is also required to raise and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Hensley v. Municipal Court, San Jose-Milpitas Judicial Dist., Santa Clara Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. John Badea v. Harvey CoxCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Elbert W. Williamson v. Christine O. GregoireCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API