Legal Opinion

Tippecanoe Loan & Trust Co. v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 8, 1914No. 8,075Published

Prom Tippecanoe Circuit Court; Henry H. Vinton, Judge. Action by tbe Tippecanoe Loan and Trust Company, administrator of the estate of George - Arbegust, deceased, against The Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company. Prom a judgment for defendant, the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion

On Petition for Rehearing.

Laiby, J.

The original opinion in this case announces the proposition that, in charging the violation of a duty in a negligence case it is sufficient as a matter of pleading, to allege that an act was negligently done or negligently omitted, without stating the conditions under which the act was done or omitted or the circumstances which attended it. The opinion further holds that the conditions and circumstances under which an act was done or omitted may be proved at the trial as evidentiary facts to be considered by the jury in deciding whether ordinary care…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LightheiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BatesIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Tippecanoe Loan & Trust Co. v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. BarkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. MathewsIndiana Supreme Court · 1912

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API