Legal Opinion

Marczak v. Brooklyn City Railroad Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order reversed on the law, without costs, and motion denied, without costs. On the facts presented by this record we are of opinion that it cannot be held that the chamberlain acted unreasonably, improperly or negligently in making the investment herein. (Chesterman v. Eyland, 81 N. Y. 398.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur. [147 Misc. 399.]

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chesterman v. . EylandNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Marczak v. Brooklyn City RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934