Legal Opinion

Elliott v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided December 8, 2010No. CA CR 10-185PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN MAUZY PITTMAN, Judge.

|,Appellant was charged with rape. After a jury trial, he was convicted of that offense and sentenced to twenty-five years’ imprisonment. On appeal, he argues that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction. He also argues that the trial court erred in permitting the State to interrupt the victim’s testimony after she became unresponsive and to later recall her for further testimony, and in permitting the introduction of an anatomical diagram of a male body on which appellant’s name was written. We affirm.

Appellant was convicted of violating Ark. Code…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  2. Hamblin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Hawkins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Kelley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  5. Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ward v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014
  2. Wingfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  4. Harlmo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API