Prewitt Enterprises, Inc. v. Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries
District Court, N.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR INADEQUATE SERVICE OF PROCESS
CLEMON, Chief Judge.
This case implicates one of the pillars of American jurisprudence. “Service of process, under longstanding tradition in our system of justice, is fundamental to any procedural imposition on a named defendant.” Murphy Brothers, Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc., 526 U.S. 344, 350, 119 S.Ct. 1322, 143 L.Ed.2d 448 (1999). The question before the Court in this important case is thus fairly straightforward: Has the Plaintiff Prewitt Enterprises, Inc. (“Prewitt”) properly served process on…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Murphy Brothers, Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Aetna Business Credit, Inc. v. Universal Decor & Interior Design, Inc., Gary L. Kemp and Sharon L. KempCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Resource Ventures, Inc. v. Resources Management International, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ishler v. CommissionerDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2006
- Vista Peak Ventures, LLC v. Giantplus Technology Co., Ltd.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2019
- Vista Peak Ventures, LLC v. Giantplus Technology Co., Ltd.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2019
- Vista Peak Ventures, LLC v. Giantplus Technology Co., Ltd.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2019
- Vista Peak Ventures, LLC v. Giantplus Technology Co., Ltd.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2019