Legal Opinion
Bicknell v. Lloyd-Smith
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 11, 1939No. 7688Published
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
This is a motion on the pleadings.
Two plaintiffs join in this action, each stating separately a cause of action.
This motion relates only to the first cause of action relating to $36,000 principal amount of bonds, the plaintiff being “Donald Bicknell, Receiver of the Bank of Saginaw, Michigan”, and does not relate to the second cause of action relating to $5,000 principal amount of bonds where the plaintiff is Edward Schust, who sues individually in his own right.
The alleged ground for the making of this motion is that on the face of the second amended complaint,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Booth v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Bernheimer v. ConverseSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Converse v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Great Western Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Sterrett Ex Rel. Alabama Trust & Savings Co. v. Second National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.