Legal Opinion

In re the Accounting of Goodliffe

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 1, 1959PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John J. Dillon, S.

By a prior decision, this court determined that two children of a brother who predeceased the testatrix, who were neither named in the petition to account, nor cited, *1068were necessary parties to the executor’s accounting proceeding and were entitled to receive the one-fourth share to which their parent would have become entitled if he had survived the testatrix. (See Matter of Goodliffe, 18 Misc 2d 412.)

Objections were thereupon filed to the account in behalf of said parties, both of whom were then minors, but one of whom has since obtained his majority, relating to the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of the Empire Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Joseph v. . HerzigNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. In Re the Accounting of First Trust & Deposit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Final Account of Proceedings of KellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  5. In re SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of Chase Manhattan BankNew York Surrogate's Court · 1961
  2. In re the Estate of MorawetzNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962
  3. In re the Estate of TefftNew York Surrogate's Court · 1964
  4. In re the Estate of ZalaznickNew York Surrogate's Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API