Legal Opinion

Slater v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 14, 1953No. Appeal, 67PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ross, J.,

This is an appeal from an order of the Public Utility Commission granting a certificate of public convenience to Ray Slater, and cancelling an outstanding certificate issued to Joseph and Ray Slater, co-partners, doing business as Slater Brothers.

Joseph Slater, appellant, and Ray Slater, intervening appellee, formed a partnership for the conduct of a trucking business in 1928 under the name of Slater Brothers. They were issued certificates of public convenience by the Public Service Commission on January 7, 1936, and by the Interstate Commerce Commission on August 29, 1938.

I…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Day v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Hostetter v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Highway Express Lines, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Slater v. SlaterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  5. Schuylkill Valley Lines, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Merz White Way Tours v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Alers v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
  3. Alers v. Superior Court of Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
  4. Orban v. Rothrock, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API