Legal Opinion

Hamill v. Ward

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court of Denver. Action on. promissory note.

1Opinion of the Court

Richmond, C.

June 17, 188é, O. H. Rothacker made his promissory note, payable four, months after date, to the order of W. A. Hamill, for the sum of $911.76, with interest at ten per cent, per annum. This note Hamill indorsed to the Rounds-Type & Press Company.

December 19,1881, appellee herein, and plaintiff below, Samuel D. Ward, as assignee of the Rounds Type & Press Company, brought suit in the superior court of the city of Denver against Rothacker and Hamill, alleging that they were joint makers of the note.

To this complaint Hamill interposed a demurrer. The grounds of the demurrer do not…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Benbow v. James JohnsOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Tabor v. MilesColorado Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Milner Bank & Trust Co. v. Estate of WhippleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
  4. Tabor v. MilesColorado Court of Appeals · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API