Legal Opinion

Kurz v. Board of Appeals of North Reading

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 3, 1960PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, C.J.

The plaintiff, “an instructress of the dance” and a member of a number of professional dance teachers ’ organizations, is the owner of land and a building on Haverhill Street in North Reading. She has used the premises in part for “the teaching of the dance” and in part as a residence for herself and family. The premises are in a district zoned Residence “A.” The zoning by-law provides, “In a Residence A or B District, no building shall be erected or altered, and no building or premises shall be used for any purpose except: 1. Detached one-family dwelling. 2. Private club not conducted for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. S. S. Kresge Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  2. Town of Needham v. Winslow Nurseries, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  3. Langbein v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  4. Foster v. Mayor of BeverlyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  5. Town of Lincoln v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Framingham Clinic, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  2. Moyer v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
  3. Mendoza v. Licensing BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  4. Shuman v. Board of Aldermen of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  5. Regis College v. Town of WestonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API