Legal Opinion · Dissent

Carter v. Norfolk & Western Railway

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 18, 1986No. 48497Published

1DissentCarl R. Gaertner, Judge

Although I agree with the determination by the majority regarding the impropriety of the withdrawal instruction, I am constrained to dissent from the remanding of this case for a new trial. Having found in favor of plaintiff on one of his alleged trial court errors, we must address the issue of submissibility before remanding the case. Grippe v. Momtazee, 696 S.W.2d 797, 799 (Mo. banc 1985).

The Missouri Supreme Court has never deviated from the rule that recovery may not be had against a railroad by a trespasser jumping on and off a moving train upon a theory of primary negligence. As stated…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McClanahan Ex Rel. McClanahan v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  2. Grippe v. MomtazeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  3. Burnam v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  4. Moore v. Lindell Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  5. Hall v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API