Bissonette v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Upon examination of the record and consideration of all the points raised in this appeal, we are of the opinion that no reversible error has been demonstrated. The issue of the constitutionality of F.S. 39.02(6) (c), 1971, was not raised and directly passed upon by the trial court and as such is precluded from consideration by this court. State v. McInnes, Fla.App.1961, 133 So.2d 581; see also Franklin v. State, Fla.App.1973, 285 So.2d 32; Mann v. State, Fla.App. 1968, 209 So.2d 472; but see Papp v. State, Fla.App.1973, 281 So.2d 600.
Accordingly, the judgment and conviction are affirmed.
MAGER…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Papp v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
- State v. McInnesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
- Mann v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Franklin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lynch v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975