Legal Opinion

State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Keenan

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 5, 1997No. 2:96-cv-01763PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOYNER, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff State Farm Fire and ¡Casualty Company (“State Farm”) brought this declaratory judgment action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201 (West 1994), in order to determine its liability with respect to an accident involving a car which it had insured. State Farm now moves for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c), claiming that the insurance policy’s coverage expressly excluded Frank Paul Mancuso (“Mancuso”), the person who was driving the vehicle at the time of the accident. State Farm argues that this exclusion warrants the entry…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Williams v. Borough of West ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  3. Gans, Curtis, G. v. Mundy, James F. And the Law Firm of Raynes, McCarty Binder & MundyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  4. Virginia J. Barry Melville v. American Home Assurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  5. Edward C. LeJEUNE; Deborah LeJeune, Appellants, v. BLISS-SALEM, INC.; E.W. Bliss Company; General Electric Co., AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Donegal Mutual Insurance v. FacklerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Henning v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API