Legal Opinion
Skidmore v. John J. Casale, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 29, 1946PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONGER, District Judge.
These are actions brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S. C.A. § 201 et seq., to recover unpaid overtime wages, liquidated damages, and attorneys’ fees as provided by the Act.
The suits were tried together without a jury.
The plaintiffs are or were employees of the defendant Casale, performing their duties at the several garages of the defendant, located in Manhattan, Brooklyn and Long Island City, and they may be catagorized as maintenance men, mechanics, and mechanics’ helpers, with the exception of two, one of whom was a porter and the other a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- McLeod v. ThrelkeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Overstreet v. North Shore Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rankine v. Levi Strauss & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Skidmore v. John J. Casale, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947