Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Rowell

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided October 16, 1995No. 2399Published

1DissentCureton, Judge

Believing the evidence sufficient to warrant submission of the case to the jury, I must respectfully dissent. The majority accurately notes that our task on appeal is to determine whether there is any evidence, either direct of circumstantial, which tends to prove Rowell’s guilt. Further, this court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the State. We are concerned only with the existence of evidence, not its weight; where the State presents any evidence which tends to prove the defendant’s guilt, or from which the defendant’s guilt could be fairly and logically deduced, the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. . CopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. State v. QuinnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
  3. State v. ChildsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  4. State v. WestonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Tubman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API