Legal Opinion

Blackton v. Gordon

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 31, 1938No. 167PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Roberts

The issue is whether the master of a vessel is entitled to the benefit of § 12 of the Act of March 4, 1915, 1 exempting wages of seamen from attachment.

The respondent recovered judgment against one Find-lay, the captain of the tug Waverly, a registered vessel of the United States operating in New York Harbor. Under a state statute Findlay’s wages due from his employer, the Erie Railroad Company, were attached by the service of an order on the petitioner, superintendent of the marine department of the railroad company. It is not disputed that if Findlay’s wages were subject to garnishment the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Warner v. GoltraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Gordon v. BlacktonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
  3. Gordon v. BlacktonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. John J. McConville v. Florida Towing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  2. Old Point Fish Co. v. HaywoodCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
  3. Evening Times, C., Co. v. American, C., GuildSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
  4. Colon De Mejias v. LamontCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
  5. George v. Kramo Ltd.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1992

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API